Update: 2011-12-31 11:19 PM +0630

TIL

ENGLISH PRONOUNCING DICTIONARY
Information panels

infoC.htm

Daniel Jones. Edited by Peter Roach, James Hartman and Jane Setter. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Scanned by Maung Kan Tun and edited by U Kyaw Tun, M.S. (I.P.S.T., U.S.A.). Not for sale. Prepared for students of TIL Computing and Language Center, Yangon, MYANMAR .

 index.htm |Top
DJPD16-indx

Contents of this page

Information panels C
| 12. Cardinal Vowel | 13. Clear L | 14. Cluster | 15. Coalescence
| 16. Coarticulation | 17. Coda | 18. Compounds | 19. Connected speech phenomena | 20. Consonant |

UKT: This file needs a thorough revision because of changes in file-names of Bur-Myan aksharas.

 

Contents of this page

12. Cardinal Vowel

p83. One of the vowels of the standard classification system used in phonetics.

Description

Phoneticians have always needed some way of classifying vowels which is independent of the vowel system of a particular language. With most consonants it is quite easy to observe how their articulation is organized, and to specify the place and manner of the constriction formed; vowels, however, are much less easy to observe. Early in the 20th century, the English phonetician Daniel Jones worked out a set of "Cardinal Vowels" that students learning phonetics could be taught to make and which would serve as reference points that other vowels could be related to.

The cardinal vowel figure is used to specify the qualities of the English vowels and diphthongs in the Introduction to this dictionary.

UKT: Bur-Myan vowels with medial pitch-register corresponding to Eng-Lat cardinal vowels:

Front: {a} {i}     - /a/ /i/
  Mid-Front: {é} {è} - /e/ /ɛ/
  Mid-Back:  {o}            - /ɔ/ /o/
Back: {u} {au} - /u/ /ɑ/

There is utter confusion in back vowels between Bur-Myan and Eng-Lat. Though there are well defined back vowels in Bur-Myan, {u}, {o}, {au}, there is no uniformity in English back vowels, /u/, /o/, /ɔ/, /ɑ/ (unrounded), /ɒ/ (rounded), as sung by various Canadians in continuous speech. My observation was (more than 10 years) on highly educated Canadians (employed by AECL in Chalk River, Ontario), and their equally educated wives, with highly varied birth and educational backgrounds: birth - Burmese, English, Indian; education: Myanmar, India (various parts), England (various parts), Kenya, Germany).

Though I am not a trained phonetician, my keen observation has led me to believe that, trying to find a reliable correspondence between Bur-Myan and Eng-Latin was just a dream. My observation is summarized in the "Comparison of Myanmar vowels to IPA" shown in the inset pix. The problem seemed to be in the lip-rounding and jaw movements. And when the IAST Indian transcription was taken into account the problem got worse.

There is agreement only in /u/, leaving the transcription of common Bur-Myan words such as {ko} in confusion. Romabama rendering of {ko} has been disputed by my good friend U Tun Tint of MLC. According to him it should be kou . I address my friend as "Ko Tun Tint" when I am writing to him in English. If I were to go along with him I would have to address him as "Kou Tun Tint" !

/kou/ - MED2010-013

The Cardinal Vowel diagram is used both for rounded and unrounded vowels, and Jones proposed that there should be a primary set of Cardinal Vowels and a secondary set. The primary includes the unrounded front vowels [i e ɛ a] , the back unrounded vowel [ɑ] and the back rounded vowels [ɔ o u] , while the secondary set comprises the front rounded vowels [y ɸ œ ɶ] , the back rounded vowel [ɒ] , and the back unrounded vowels [ʌ ɤ ɯ] .

UKT:
• Latin small letter phi , U+0278 [ɸ] has been inserted in place of the italicized phi that was present in the original text.
• The words "rounded" and "unrounded" refer to the shape of the lips while singing the vowels. It is usual to have in Bur-Myan, only unrounded vowels as front vowels and rounded vowels as back vowels. The same is true for my personal dialect (a mix-up of RP, GA, Canadian-English, and Burglish) aka idiolect. As for other English dialects I am not competent to say.

Phonetic "ear-training" makes much use of the Cardinal Vowel system, and students can learn to identify and discriminate a very large number of different vowels in relation to the Cardinal vowels.

UKT: The material scientist, or the "skeptical chemist" in me always doubts human observation such as "phonetic ear-training". There is only one way: to use instruments to study the sound waves. In other words to rely on measured formants only. 

My life-long wish (since my early teens -- I'm now over 76) is to come up with a scheme to write the Burmese speech from the keyboard of an English typewriter. I learned how to type (touch method) on my father U Tun Pe's English typewriter similar to the one shown on the right. My present research is one of my attempts to come up with such a system -- which I've named Romabama (from Romanized Burmese). As a beginning I arrived at a one-to-one transliteration of Bur-Myan (Burmese-Myanmar) to Romabama (Burmese-Latin) based on Eng-Lat (English-Latin). I am turning it into a workable transcription by going into Pali and Sanskrit. - UKT110218, 111231

There are  two kinds of presentation of the vowels in Bur-Myan: the basic vowels which is very similar to the Pal-Myan (Pali-Myanmar), and the more modern one taught in school.

Table of Pali-Myanmar vowels

UKT note: There is difference between Pal-Myan and Skt-Dev which has led me to suggest that Pal-Myan is more related to Vedic [the term 'Vedic Sanskrit' has been used - but I now prefer the term 'Vedic' because it could very well be an indigenous language related to other Tibeto-Burman languages used just south of the Himalaya from Afganistan to Myanmar and slightly beyond to the east] than to the Classical Sanskrit of Panini पाणिनि {pa-Ni.ni.} in rhotic and lateral sounds. The Sanskrit given in the table below is the Classical Sanskrit - the Sanskrit in use today.

Table of Burmese-Myanmar vowels

 

Contents of this page

13. Clear L

p101. A type of LATERAL sound in which the air escapes past the sides of the tongue, found normally only before vowels. Usually contrasted with DARK L.

UKT: A lateral sound is simply a sound involving the akshara {la.}. It is an approximant and is known in Bur-Myan an {a.wag} 'hard to classify' sound. Bur-Myan is extremely rich in laterals: {la.}, {lya.}, {lwa.}, {lha.}, {lhya.}, {lhwa.}, whereas Eng-Lat cannot even handle Welsh <ll> sounds. The killed (coda) {l} is usually not pronounced in Bur-Myan, e.g. {bol} sounds like / {bo}/.

Examples for English

In the case of an alveolar lateral (e.g. English /l/ the blade of the tongue (the part further back than the tip) is in contact with the alveolar ridge, but the rest of the tongue is free to take up different shapes. One possibility is for the front of the tongue (the part behind the blade) to be raised in the same shape as that for a close front vowel [i]. This gives the /l/ [i]-like sound and the result is a "clear l". It is found notably in BBC English only before vowels, but in some other accents, notably Irish and Welsh ones, it is found in all positions. However, the variant most often found in all positions is "DARK L". e.g.

<pill>  /pɪl/  [pʰɪɫ]

UKT:
   "Some phoneticians speak of the dark and light variants of /l/. What they call light /l/ might also be termed pre-vocalic /l/; while dark /l/ is post-vocalic. In cases of intervocalic /l/, the liquid will tend to group either with the preceding syllable, in which case it is dark, or with the following syllable, in which case it is light. But there are many cases where the distinction is not so clear, and we get elements of both, leading to the nice diamond or O shape between F2 and F3 which is an easy marker for /l/."
   The following is from Structure of Spoken Language, The Approximants, http://cslu.cse.ogi.edu/tutordemos/SpectrogramReading/
Follow the link to The Approximants in TIL archives.

 

Contents of this page

14. Cluster

p103. Two or more CONSONANT PHONEMES in sequence, with no vowel sound between them.

Examples for English

English can allow up to three consonants in a cluster syllable initially in the ONSET, and four syllables finally in the CODA. For example, the word <stray> /streɪ/ begins with three consonants, and <sixths> /sɪksθs/ ends with four.

Some types of grammatical information are shown by adding certain consonants at the ends of words in English, giving rise to consonant clusters, e.g.:

<likes>  /laɪks/
<lives>  /lɪvz/

<liked>  /laɪkt/
<lived>  /lɪvd/

<Mark's>  /mɑːks/ (US) /mɑːrks/
<John's>  /ʤɒnz/ (US) /ʤɑːnz/

<cats>  /kæts/
<dogs>  /dɒgz/ (US) /dɑːgz/

 

Contents of this page

15. Coalescence

p103. A kind of ASSIMILATION in which a fusion of neighbouring sounds takes place during rapid or CONNECTED SPEECH.

Examples for English

The most frequently observed situation in which coalescence occurs in English is when ALVEOLAR consonants /t d s z/ are followed by /j/, e.g.:

<won't you> /wəʊnt ju/ --> /ˈwəʊnʧu/
  (US) <won't you> /woʊnt-/ --> /woʊnt-/

<would you>  /wʊd ju/ --> /ˈwʊʤu/

/ˈwʊʤu/  /mɪs ju/ --> /ˈmɪʃu/

<lose you>  /luːz ju/  -->  /ˈluːʒu/

In the case of coalescence with /s z/, there will usually be extra length to the resulting fricative sounds. e.g.:

<miss you>  /mɪs ju/  -->  /ˈmɪʃʃu/

<lose you>  /luːz ju/  -->  /ˈluːʒʒu/

A common very much reduced example of coalescence is <do you> being pronounced as /ʤə/.

UKT: In a way the above is comparable to the formation of medial {ya. ping.} in Burmese-Myanmar. However, it is to be noted that {ta. da. sa. za.} corresponding to English  /t d s z/ are not "allowed" to form {ya. ping.} because of their sibilant nature.

<won't you> /wəʊnt ju/ --> /ˈwəʊnʧu/
   {woan.tyu} = {woan.kyu}

This explains in part, why {kya.} and {hkya.} have been associated with /ʧ/. You should note that though English-Latin <k> is traditionally equated to Burmese-Myanmar {ka.}, it's pronunciation is closer to that of <hka.>.

 

Contents of this page

16. Coarticulation

p104. The influence of phonetic context on the articulation of speech sounds.

Examples for English

Phonetics studies coarticulation as a way of finding out how the brain controls the production of speech. When we speak, many muscles are active at the same time and sometimes the brain tries to make them do things that they are not capable of. For example, in the word <mum> the vowel phoneme is one that is normally pronounced with the soft palate raised to prevent the escape of air through the nose, while the two /m/ phonemes must have the soft palate lowered. The soft palate cannot be raised very quickly, so the vowel is likely to be pronounced with the soft palate still lowered, giving a nasalized quality to the vowel, e.g.:

<mum>  /mʌm/  [mɐ̃m]    (/ɐ̃/= U0250 U0303)

Another example is the lip-rounding of a consonant in the environment of rounded vowels: in the phrase <you too>, the /t/ occurs between two rounded vowels, and there is not enough time in normal speech for the lips to move from rounded to unrounded and back again in a few hundreds of a second; consequently the /t/ is pronounced with lip-rounding, e.g.:

<you too>  /juː tuː/  [jʉːtʷʉː]

Co-articulation is a phenomenon closely related to ASSIMILATION. The major difference is that assimilation is used as a name for the process whereby one sound becomes like another neighbouring sound, while coarticulation, though it refers to a similar process, is concerned with the articulatory explanations for why the assimilation occurs and considers cases where the changes may occur over a number of segments.

Contents of this page

17.Coda

p105. The end of a syllable, which is said to be made up of an ONSET, a peak and a coda. The peak and the coda constitute the RHYME (or RIME) of the syllable.

Examples for English

English allows up to four consonants to occur in the coda, so the total number of possible codas in English is very large -- several hundred in fact, e.g.:

<sick>  /sɪk/
<six>  /sɪks/
<sixth>  /sɪksθ/
<sixths>  /sɪksθs/

The central part of a syllable is almost always a vowel, and if the syllable contains nothing after the vowel it is said to have no coda ('zero coda'), e.g.

<bough>  /baʊ/
<buy>  /baɪ/

In other languages

Some languages (e.g. Japanese) have no codas in any syllables.

Contents of this page

18. Compounds

p111. This panel looks at word STRESS stress in compounds. Compounds are words made up of two other words which can exist independently in English. They are written in a variety of ways: closed, e.g. <armchair>, <sunflower>; hyphenated, e.g. <front-runner>, <she-devil>; open, e.g. <side salad>, <bank manager>. Sometimes it is possible for the same compounds to be written in different ways, e.g. <shoulder blade> or <shoulderblade>.

There are some rules for compound word stress in English but they are not completely reliable. In addition, British and US English differ. The rules which follow are therefore guidelines, but exceptions exist.

Examples

Words that combine two nouns usually have primary stress on the first element, e.g.:

<coffee pot>  /ˈkɒf.i.pɒt/  (US)  /ˈkɑː.fi.pɑːt/
<suitcase>  /ˈsuːt.keɪs/

In US English, it is more frequently the case that compound nouns have first element stress, and this tendency is appearing among some British English speakers. For example, <ice cream> can have first or second-element stress in British English, but tends to be stressed on the first element in US English.

Other types of compound are usually stressed on the second element. These include words ending in -ed which are used as adjectives, words with a number as a first element, and words functioning as adverbs or verbs, e.g.:

<kind-hearted> /ˌkaɪndˈhɑː.tɪd/ (US) /-ˈhɑːr.t̬ɪd/
<three-piece> /ˌθriːˈpiːs/
<southeast> /ˌsaʊθˈiːst/

These words are subject to stress-shift when a stressed syllable follows closely (e.g., /ɑ ˌkindheɑrted ˈmɑn/.

Contents of this page

19. Connected speech phenomena

p115. The process which result in words being pronounced differently from their dictionary form when they occur in close contact with other words.

Examples for English

In natural speech we rarely leave gaps between words, and we can observed many processes that result in differences between isolated words and the same words occurring in connected speech: examples are ASSIMILATION and ELISION, e.g.:

(assimilation) <one boy> /wʌn bɔɪ/ /wʌn bɔɪ/
                                     /lɑːst taɪm/ /lɑːs taɪm/
(elision) <last time> (US) /læst taɪm/ (US) /læs taɪm/

The study of connected speech also involves looking at the process of VOWEL REDUCTION in weak syllables (see also WEAK FORM), at RHYTHM and prosodic phenomena such as INTONATION and STRESS.

Contents of this page

20. Consonant

p115. A speech sound which obstructs the flow of air through the vocal tract or a letter of the alphabet representing such a vowel.

Examples for English

There are many types of consonant, but what all have in common is that they obstruct the flow of air through the vocal tract. Some do this a lot, some not very much: those which make the maximum obstruction (i.e. PLOSIVES, which form a complete stoppage of the airstream) are the most consonantal, e.g.:

 

  <bat> /bæt/   <keep> /kiːp/

NASAL consonants result in complete stoppage of the oral cavity but are less obstructive than plosives since air is allowed to escape through the nose, e.g.:

<man> /mæn/ <name> /neɪm/

FRICATIVES make a considerable obstruction to the flow of air, but not a total closure, e.g.:

  <sheaf> /ʃiːf/   <south> /saʊθ/

The class of sounds called APPROXIMANTS comprises sounds which make very little obstruction of the flow of air.

The post-alveolar approximant that is the usual pronunciation of /r/ in BBC English involves no contact between the tongue and the palate, e.g.:

  <red> /red/ [ɹed]   <arrive> /əˈraɪv/ [əˈɹaɪv]

LATERAL approximants obstructs the flow of air only in the centre of the mouth, not at the sides, so obstruction is slight, e.g.:

  <lull> /lʌl/

Other sounds classed as approximants make so little obstruction to the flow of air that they could almost be thought to be vowels if they were in a different context. These are sometimes referred to as 'semi-vowels', e.g.:

  <you> /juː/   <woo> /wuː/

Finally, AFFRICATES begin as plosives and are released as fricatives, with no intervening gap, e.g.:

  <church> /ʧɜːʧ/(us)/ʧɝːʧ/   <judge> /ʤʌʤ/

The above explanation is based on phonetic criteria. An alternative approach is to look at the phonological characteristics of consonants: for example, consonants are typically found at the beginning (UKT: ONSET) and end (UKT: CODA) of syllables while vowels are typically found in the middle.

Contents of this page

End of TIL file