Update: 2020-12-21 05:54 PM -0500

TIL

Grammar of the Burmese Language  

JudsonGram1-.htm

From Grammar of the Burmese Language, by A. Judson, American Baptist Mission Press, Rangoon, 1883
Downloaded copies in TIL HD-PDF and SD-PDF libraries, and in TIL Bk-Cndl Online Library:
- AJudson-GramBur-Lang<Ô> / Bkp<Ô> / BkCnd<OL> (link chk 201101)

See also online in Wikisource: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Grammar_of_the_Burmese_Language 201212

Set in html and edited by U Kyaw Tun (UKT) (M.S., I.P.S.T., USA), and staff of Tun Institute of Learning (TIL). 
Not for sale. No copyright. Free for everyone. Prepared for students and staff of TIL Research Station, Yangon, MYANMAR :  http://www.tuninst.net , www.romabama.blogspot.com

index.htm | Top
BG-indx.htm

Contents of this page

UKT 201203: Note: in older books section numbers in § (alt0167) are more important for giving reference than page numbers. I've to show that the section numbers may go up to 999, by adding a 00 before 1. The last section number is §138. I'm dividing the book into 3 vols:
v1. Akshara and Alphabet - §001 to §045
v2. Parts of Speech - §046 to §127
v3. Appendix - §128 to §138

Moreover, I have to follow Judson's English spelling, whenever necessary, even if they are outdated. Remember that in Judson's days, the distinction between the Abugida system of writing (or Abugida-Akshara) and the Alphabet system (or  Alphabet-Letter) has not been made and I've to strike-through the word letter and replaced it by the word akshara (which I'll shorten to aks sometimes. Moreover, the modern science of Phonetics of Henry Sweet which began with A Handbook of Phonetics, in 1877 was yet to be born. Note also that the TOC below is mine.

p05. 
Introduction
  §001 , §002 , §003,
Akshara and Alphabet
  §004 , §005 , §006
Akshara Matrix - that sets it apart from the Alphabet
  §007 , §008 , §009 , §010 , §011
Vowels : vowels are always pronounceable
  §012 ,
Consonants : with inherent vowel {mwé-hkûn þa.ra.}s are pronounceable
  §013 , §014 ,
Medials : Compound consonants
  §015 , §016, §017 ,
Combination of Vowels with Consonants
 §018 , §019 , §020 , §021 , §022 ,

Coda : Final consonants
 §023 , §024 , §025 , §026 , §027 , §028 , §029 ,
 §030 , §031 , §032 , §033 , §034 , §035 , §036 ,
Pitch Registgers
 §037 , §038 , §039 ,
Abbreviations
 §040 , §041§042 ,
Numerical figures
 §043 ,
Punctuation
 §044 , §045 ,

 

Author's footnotes

UKT notes

Contents of this page

Introduction 

(p05.)
§001. The Burmese language [script] is written from left to right, and without any division of words. [i.e. without white spaces in between words.]

§002. The pure Burmese [script and speech] is monosyllabic, every word consisting of one syllable only; but the introduction of the Pali language, with the Boodhistic religion [Theravada Buddhism], has occasioned the incorporation many polysyllabic words of Pali origin into the pure Burmese.

§003. The form of the aksharas letters , the order of the vowels and consonants, and the classification of the aksharas letter , prove* [UKT: dissent] Burmese abugida alphabet is but one modification the ancient Nagari [script] ; as the Pali language itself, as used by the Burmese [people], is but a modification of Sanscrit [Skt-Devanagari]

*UKT 201101: Rev. Judson has made a mistake here. He did not know that there are two systems of Speech-to-Script systems involved: Abugida-Akshara system where the Akshara is a Syllable and is pronounceable, whereas in the Alphabet-Letter system the Letter is mute.

Also the Rev. must have failed to note that Asokan-Brahmi is the oldest script found in India. See how Bur-Myan could be the ancestor of Asokan through the intermediary of Pyu of Burma, and also how the Kadamba script could have been a descendant of Pyu.
See Wikipedia on Kamdamba - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kadamba_script 201101
"The Kadamba script is the first writing system devised specifically for writing Kannada [speech] and Telugu [speech]. It is a descendant of the Brahmi script [Asokan-Brahmi], an abugida visually close to the Kalinga alphabet. [ citation needed] The Kadamba script is also known as Pre-Old-Kannada script. This script later became popular in what is today the state of Goa and was used to write Kannada [speech] and Sanskrit [speech - note here that there are two dialects of Sanskrit and here what Wiki must have meant the southern-dialect.]

Let's first note the present-day understanding is on Scripts, keeping in mind that no one at present could have heard how the ancient Speeches must have sounded. Remember - actual recording of Speech is a very recent invention. How an ancient Speech, such as that of Gautama Buddha, must have sounded is at best an approximation if not utterly false.
Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N%C4%81gar%C4%AB_script - 201101
"The Nāgarī script is the ancestor of Devanagari, Nandinagari and other variants, and was first used to write Prakrit and Sanskrit. The term is sometimes used as a synonym for Devanagari script. [6] [7] It came in vogue during the first millennium CE. [8] "

 

Contents of this page

AKSHARA and ALPHABET

(p05 - cont)
§004. The Burmese akshara alphabet [shortened to aks occasionally] consists of ten vowels {þa.ra.}, and thirty-two consonants {byæÑ:} .

 

§005. The ten vowels  are:

{a.} ɑ, {a} ɑ, - {I.} ee, {II} ee, - {U.}, oo, {U} oo,
- {É} aa, [or ey in they, ?] {è:} ai, - {AU.} {AU} {AU:} au,
- to which may be added the monophthong diphthong {o} o.

UKT 201203: What the Rev. has given are Vowel-Letters.
He has given 12+1 vowels without differentiating the matching pairs  {þa.wûN} from non-matching pairs {a.þa.wûN}.

 

§006. The thirty-two consonants (in rows r and columns c are:

-- ----------- c1, c2 --------------------- c3, c4 -------------------- c5 

r1: {ka.}ka, {hka.}'ka, - {ga.}ga, {Ga.}ga, - {gna.}/ {ng}nga,
r2: {sa.}tsa, {hsa.}'tsa, - {za.}dza, {Za.}dza, - {Ña.}/ {Ñ}nya
 affricate:  {ca.}, {cha.} ------ {ja.}, ? {Ja.} -------- {ña.}/ {ñ}
r3: {Ta.}ta, {HTa.}'ta, ---- {ða.}da, {Ða.}da, --- {Na.}/ {N} na ,
r4: {ta.}ta, {hta.}'ta, ----- {da.}da, {Da.}da, ---- {na.}/ {n} na ,
r5: {pa.}pa, {hpa.}'pa, --- {ba.}ba, {Ba.}ba, ---- {ma.}/ {m} ma ,

 approximant: r6: {ya.}ya, {ra.}ra, - {la.}la, -  {wa.}wa,  - {þa.}tha ,
 approximant: r7: -------- {ha.}la,  --- {La.}la,  ------- {a.}, {än}  
- to which may be added the diacritic character {än}-sign

UKT 201203: Judson's transcriptions in italics, are given after Romabama. For r1c2, {hka.} 'ka, there is an open inverted comma: meaning that & are allophones, but there is a slight difference - what the westerners call "aspiration". Now, what do they mean by "aspiration"?

as·pi·ra·tion - n. ¹. Expulsion of breath in speech. ². Linguistics a. The pronunciation of a consonant with an aspirate. b. A speech sound produced with an aspirate. ³. The act of breathing in; inhalation.

However, there is no inverted comma for r1c5, {Ga.} ga, meaning that & are pronounced the same. Judson does not give the affricates, nor the International Pali variation {va.}, of Bur-Myan and Pal-Myan {wa.}, but I've given them to show that our Reverend's knowledge of Pali-Myan was less that of his knowledge of the International Pali. Of course, Judson has scant knowledge of Phonetics because when he wrote his grammar in 1883, Henry Sweet had just published his A Handbook of Phonetics, in 1877.

 

Contents of this page

The Akshara Matrix - that sets it apart from the Alphabet

(p06)
§007. According to the foregoing arrangement, the first twenty-five consonants are distributed into five classes. [UKT ¶]

The aks letters of :
- row#1 the first or {ka.}-class are velars gutturals (  {kûN~ða.za}) (Jp06-fn01);
- those of row#2 the second or {sa.}-class are palatals ( {ta-lu.za});
- those of row#3 the third or {Ta.}-class are retroflex cerebrals ( {moad~Da.za})
- those of the fourth row#4 or {ta.}-class are dentals (dûn~ta.za}; and
- those of the fifth row#5 or {pa.}-class are labials {AUT~HTa.za}

§008. The first [c1] aks letter of each class is a simple articulation, smooth and soft ;
- the third [c3] is the same, rough and hard;
- the second [c2] is the aspirate of the first [c1];
- the fourth [c4] according to the Nagari system [?], is the aspirate of the third [c3], but according to the Burmese pronunciation, is the same; and
- the fifth [c5] is the corresponding nasal.

UKT 201205: Rev. Judson did not seem to know that English does not have the tenuis-voiceless or simply tenuis. Moreover what did he mean by the Nagari system? He seems to mean "the Indian-system - probably Sanskrit". With scant knowledge of Phonetics we appreciate what he had done.

§009. The pronunciation of the retroflex cerebrals and the dentals, though different in the Nagari [Sanskirit ?], is the same in the Burmese.

 

§010. Of the seven remaining consonants, {ya.}, {ra.}, {la.}, {wa.}, {La.} are liquids; {þa.} is properly a fricative sibilant , but pronounced th , and {ha.} is an aspirate .

UKT 201205:
" Liquid, in phonetics, a consonant sound in which the tongue produces a partial closure in the mouth, resulting in a resonant, vowel-like consonant, such as English l and r. Liquids may be either syllabic or nonsyllabic; i.e., they may sometimes, like vowels, act as the sound carrier in a syllable. " - Google search, Jul 20, 1998
When the Rev. stated
{þa.} is properly a sibilant, he was just echoing what the Indians have said, without noting the English pronunciation of the word <thin> . In Skt-Dev, the digraph «th» is {hta.}, and {þa.} /s/. What he had said of {ha.} is not correct: it has the sound of English h : as in "Henry Higgins" .

§011. The retroflex cerebrals and the aks letter {La.} are found in words only of Pali origin.

Contents of this page

Vowels : always pronounceable

§012. The names and powers of the vowels are as follows:

UKT 201206 : "After the Third Anglo-Burmese War in 1885, Upper Burma was annexed, and the following year, the province of Burma in British India was created, becoming a major province (a lieutenant-governorship) in 1897. [3] " - Wikipedia; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_rule_in_Burma - 201206

Judson, writing in 1883 - just a couple of years before Burma became just a province of India, and Burmese being just a provincial language among the Indian languages, gave his "hearing" of the Burmese vowels as given on the right. Sixteen years later, in 1899, Lonsdale gave his as below.

Judson's footnotes are in symbols which I've to change to numbers,
e.g.,  * - Jfn01  

 

Contents of this page

Consonants : with inherent vowels are pronounceable

(p07)
§013. The names and powers of the consonants are as follows:

UKT 201216: The PDF copy BkCnd<OL> from which I'm writing contains handwritten notes, presumably of Dr. Walter Koels, written on empty spaces of Judson's pages. Dr. Koels was the one who donated the book to Univ. of Michigan Library. These are extremely important for our understanding of the views of the early English grammarians on Bur-Myan grammar. Caveat: I'm not saying Dr. Koels was a contemporary of Rev. Judson. In fact, I could not find anything on Dr. Koels on the Internet.

See what A. Lonsdale has to say 16 years later in
- BG1899-indx.htm >  BG1899-1-indx.htm > ch03.htm (link chk 201206)
I've given the numbers of row and column of the cell in the Akshara-matrix occupied by the aks, for ease of identification. It is unfortunate that many authors do not know the phonetic property of the Akshara matrix.

Velars :   {kûN~ða.za}
r1c1: {ka.kri:}
r1c2: {hka.hkwé}
r1c3: {ga.gnèý}
r1c4: {Ga.kri:}
r1c5: {gna.}/ {ng}

UKT 201206: Dr. Koels noted the difference in spelling of onset (initial part of the syllable) as {gna} , and coda (final part of the syllable) as {nga}. His observation lends support to my calling r1c5, as Semi-nasal . He, as well as Judson, seemed to know that the middle part of the syllable is a vowel, which we call nuclear vowel {nyu-ka.li.ya þa.ra.}.

Palatals : {ta-lu.za}
r2c1: {sa.loän:}
r2c2: {hsa.laim}
r2c3: {za.hkwè:}
r2c4: - {Za.myæÑ:hswè:}
r2c5: {ña.} or {Ña.}/ {Ñ}

UKT 201206: Judson gives both Nya-minor {ña.}, and Nya-major {Ña.}, but not the killed consonants, {ñ} and {Ñ}. He has failed to differentiate Nya-minor (Affricate) from Nya-major, (Stop) and the word or is a mistake. The mistake did not originate with the Westerners, but originated with the IE (Indo-European) speaking Indians and the Skt-Dev speech and script in which row#2 is affricate. However, probably in Asokan-Brahmi, and definitely in  Bur-Myan, row#2 is stop. English speakers, both American and English being IE speakers themselves swallowed what the Indians had fed them.

Retroflex : {moad~Da.za}
r3c1: - {Ta.þän-lyín:hkyait}
r3c2: - {HTa.wûm:Bè:}
r3c3: - {ða.rín-kauk}
r3c4: - {Ða.ré-mhoat}
r3c5: {Na-major}  {Na.} / {N}

 

Dental : (dûn~ta.za} 
r4c1: {ta.wûm:pu}
r4c2: {hta.hsín-htu:}
r4c3: {da.htwé:}
r4c4: {Da.auk-hkreik}
r4c5: {na.gnèý} {na.} / {n} 

(p07end-p08begin)

Palatal : {AUT~HTa.za
r5c1: {pa.sauk}
r5c2: {hpa.U:htoap}
r5c3: {ba.htak-hkreik}
r5c4: {Ba.koan:}
r5c5: {ma.} / {m}

 

Approximant :

r6c1: {ya.pak-lak}
r6c2: {ra.kauk}
r6c3: {la.}
r6c4: {wa.}
r6c5: {þa.}

r7c2: {ha.}
r7c3: {La.}
r7c4: [Judson leaves this cell empty. However, we have {a.} as a consonant in this cell. See §14 for Judson's comment on this place.]

Contents of this page

§014. The character ( ) called  {þé:þé:tín}, small thing placed above, is placed over the akshara letter with which it is combined, and has the power of a coda final [in Bur-Myan & Pal-Myan syllables], or coda final [in Skt-Dev & International Pali syllable], divested of its inherent heavy accent (see Accents); thus {än} an , {þän} than .

Contents of this page

Medials : Compound consonants

UKT 201207: Medials are found only in Bur-Myan. In Mon-Myan, there are medials, but also what are known as Hanging-consonants which can only be pronounced after including a schwa. Medials are pronounceable like the regular consonants. What are found in Skt-Dev are conjuncts which are not pronounceable.

§015. [Medials aka ] Compound Consonants are formed by combining one or more of the medial-formers letters [which we have already met above in Approximants] {ya.}, {ra.}, {wa.}, and {ha.}, under symbolic forms with simple consonants, according to the following table, in which {ma.} is selected as the principle [which we usually call Dummy character], because that is the only aks letter which admits all the adjuncts: -

 

§016.

UKT 201207: Table on the right is from Judson. I've given below the medials formed from basic consonant {ma.}. They like {ma.} itself, can occur in 3 registers with vowel-lengths: 1 eye-blink, 2 blnk, emphatic 2 blnk and sometimes with 1/2 blnk. e.g. {mya.}, {mya}, {mya:}. The order of entries below do not follow the traditional order.

with 0-medial former: {ma.}
with 1-medial former: {mha.} , {mra.} , {mya.} ,  {mwa.},
with 2-medial former: {mhya.} , {mwra.] , {mwya.},
--------------------------- {mhra.} , {mwra.} ,
with 3-medial former: {mhwra.}

(p08end-p09begin)

§017. The letter {ha.}, in the quality of an "aspirate", may be combined with:
- the nasals, as {gnha}, {Ñha.}, {Nha.}, {nha.}, {mha.},
- the liquids {la.} and {wa.}, as {hla.}, {wha.}.
But when combined with {ya.}, or {ra.}, the compound has the power of sh , as ... shan .  [UKT ¶].

UKT 201208: The last sentence is the one I cannot accept. With {ya.} with IPA /j/ or English /y/, you can get {yhûn}, but with {ra.} IPA /r/ or English /ɹ/ you can get only {rhûn} with the onset /r/ - never /s/. It means that I must invent a new aks for /sh/ from a non-existent phoneme. For the non-existent phoneme I choose Skt-Dev Dental ष ṣ [ʂ] /s/ : {Sa.}/ {S} (which is not the same as Palatal {sa.}/ {c}). Because the Dental {Sa.} is not from Regular Bur-Myan, my good friend U Tun Tint of MLC has no objection when I apply Ha'hto: to it: . Now, Romabama has {Sha.}/ {Sh} - the same as Skt-Dev Dental श ś [ɕ] /ʃ/ .

{lhya.} 'lya also is frequently pronounced sha , and {þhya.} has the same power.
{gnra.} is equivalent to {Ña.} nya , and 
{yya.} to {ya.}, ya.

Contents of this page

Combination of Vowels with Consonants

§018. The vowel {a.} is supposed to be inherent in every consonant that is not furnished with the symbol of another vowel, or marked as coda final [with a Flag {tän-hkûn} .].

 

§019. The other vowels are combined with consonants, simple or compound, under symbolic forms, according to the following table: -

 

§020. [Table given on the right. "Junction" with dummy {ka.} given below. Vowel-lengths given in eye-blnks.]
- {ka.} (1blnk), {ka} (2blnk); {ki.} (1blnk), {ki} (2blnk);
  {ku.} (1blnk), {ku} (2blnk};
- {ké} (2blnk}, {kè:} (emphatic 2blnk);
  {kau.} (1blnk}, {kau} (2blnk); {ko}

 

§021. The second symbol of the vowel {a} ( ) [Mauk'cha {mauk-hkya.}] is used whenever the use of the first [Weik'cha {weik-hkya.} ( )] would make the consonant look like convert the consonant into another aks letter , -- also with {hka.} and {gna.}, as , not .   The latter part of the symbols of {AU:} and {AU}, is similarly modified in the same circumstances, as {hkau} , not .

 

§022. The symbol of any vowel may be combined with the vowel {a.}, in which case the compound has the power of the vowel which the symbol represents; thus
- {i.} is equivalent to {I.}
- {u.} to {U.}, &c.

(p09end-p10begin)

Contents of this page

Coda - Final Consonants

§023. When a consonant is deprived of its its inherent vowel {mwé-hkûn þa.ra.} {a.}, and not furnished with the symbol of another, it becomes final [coda] in the syllable. [UKT ¶]

UKT 201214: Don't forget the canonical structure CVÇ of the syllable where Ç the coda is different from C the onset. In the Alphabet-Letter system with the canonical structure CVC, there is no difference between coda and onset. In both systems, the nuclear vowel {nyu-ka.li þa.ra.} V + the coda is called rime

" Rhyme is much broader, in that many words can have the same sounds and not necessarily be part of the same word family or spelt using the same letters. So, in a nutshell. Rhyme relates to phonemic awareness (what we HEAR) and rime relates to phonics (the letters that are used to make the sound)". -- Google Search, May 19, 2019

The absence of the inherent vowel {a.} is denoted by a [Flag {tän-hkûn}] mark  () called [ {a.þût} - Virama in Sanskrit] that , [th as in thin , st.] signifying killed , placed above the consonant thus, {k}, or by another consonant subjoined, thus {k~hka.} [= ]; in which case the subjoined consonant becomes the onset initial of the next syllable, thus {kût~hta.} [first syllable shown in red made up of {kût}, and second syllable made up of only one aks {hta.}] .

UKT 201209: Virama or Viram for short, {a.þût} is shown explicitly in Bur-Myan and Skt-Dev, but not in Pali-Myan. Instead of showing the Virama, Pali-Myan uses vertical conjuncts such as   {k~hka.} [= ]. By itself   {k~hka.} [= ] is mute. However, when preceded by an aks , by using the inherent vowel of the preceding aks , the resulting disyllabic word becomes pronounceable. e.g. {kût~hta.}. There is another type of conjunct - the horizontal conjunct e.g. Tha-major {þ~þa.} - which we will meet presently.

§024. One consonant however is sometimes placed under another as a mere abbreviation, and does not therefore deprive the preceding consonant of its inherent vowel {mwé-hkûn þa.ra.}; thus [illegitimate abbreviation] to {þa.ma:}, and is to be read, not thma , but tha-ma .

 

§025. [Cell r2c5] has two forms [Nya-minor] {ña.} (single), and [Nya-major] {Ña.} (double).   In elementary works, therefore, the double form may be well distinguished by subjoining a double tail, thus  

§026. [Retroflex] {Ta.} with {HTa.} subjoined is sometimes [erroneously] written as . But frequently and more properly as {T~Hta.}. [It is a horizontal conjunct and is mute.]    A double {þa.} [is called Tha-major, and ] is written as {þ~þa.}. [It is also a horizontal conjunct and is mute.]

 

§027. Final consonants [Coda of syllable] generally assume a new and peculiar power, and also modify the preceding vowel [the nuclear vowel {nyu-ka.li.ya þa.ra.} of the syllable]. These permutations, as they occur in words of pure Burmese origin, are exhibited in the following table [which I've modified]:

(p10end-p11begin)

§028.

UKT 201215: Judson's table of Coda is given on the right. Column headings are in Vowel-Letters and Vowel-signs. The vow-duration for {þa·wûN} tenuis is 1 eye-blink, and nasal is 1 blnk to 2 blnk, but for {a.þa·wûN} is 2 blnk. One {a.þa·wûN} missing in Judson is {É} : from which we get {ít} and {hkít}.

------- {a.} c1 / c5 ----------- {I.} / {U.} --------- {AU:} / {o}
---------- -------------------------  ----- ---------------- ------

r1: -- {ak}/ ----------------------------------------------- {auk} /  {eik}
----------------- {ín} --------------------------------------- {aún} /  {eín}
r2: -- {ic}/ {æÑ}
r4: -- {ût}/ {ûn} -------- {ait} / {oat}
r5: -- {ûp}/ {ûm} ------- {aip} / {oap}

 

Contents of this page

§029. The coda final syllables , as here exhibited, are combined with any consonant simple or compound, as {kak} ket {kyín} kyeen , &c. without any change in their pronunciation, except in two cases, viz: {wa.}
- before {t} or {p} wŏt * (Jp11-fn01) not wat , and
- before {n}, {m}, or {än}, wŏn  or woon not wan ;  and consonants compounded with {wa.} , as {kwa.} , {swa.} , &c.
- before {t} or {p}, are commonly pronounced kooat (Jp11-fn02) , and
- before {n}, {m}, or {än} ,  kooan , tsooan , &c. (These coda final consonants are not pronounced as distinctly as in English.st.)

UKT 201209: The last line within ( ... ) is due to Judson's failure to realize that English syllable structure CVC (Consonant-Vowel-Consonant), and that of Bur-Myan, CVÇ where Ç is a killed-consonant, are different. In English which use the Alphabet-Letter system, the coda is distinctly pronounced, whereas the coda is a killed-consonant, the coda is not pronounced. However in BEPS which use Romabama the coda may or may not be pronounced.

§030. There are also many words of Pali origin, in which consonants, final in a syllable [ i.e. coda], are subject to permutations somewhat similar to the above, and others of a peculiar character. A key to the whole is furnished in the following table:

§031. [Judson's table on p11 is given on the right]

 

§032. In the preceding table, coda final consonants are marked [with a Flag {tän-hkûn}] , for the sake of simplifying the tabular view; but though there are some instances of that kind, as
  - {U.poaþ}, oo-pōk ,
  - {ma.htér}, ma-'tee ,
in almost all cases derived from the Pali, coda final consonants are made so by having other consonants subjoined, as
  - {AIn~dRé}, eing-dray, or by modification (see §23), ein-dray, 
  - {OAc~sa}, ōk-tsa , or by modification  ōt-tsa,
  - {mét~ta}, meet-ta (Jp11-fn03)
  - {AUt~tûp~pa.} oot-tap-pa .
(p11end-p12begin)

Contents of this page

§033. As an appendix to both the proceeding tables, note: -

1st. Retroflex cerebrals, when final (coda)
   [ {T}, {HT}, {ð}, {Ð}, {N}],
are the same as dentals
   [ {t}, {ht}, {d}, {D}, {n}] ;
thus, {ûT~HTa.ma.} is pronounced at-ta-ma, as if written {ût~hta.ma.} .

2nd. The third [killed] akshara letter [c3] of each row class is the same as the first [c1]; thus {praþ~þûd}, pronounced pyat-that , as if written {praþ~þût}

3rd. The second [c2] and fourth [c4] akshara letters of each row class never occur as coda finals, except in some words derived from the Pali, - when they are mute; as {moG:}, from {mé-Ga.}, the sky, pronounced mo .

4th. [Approximant Coda] {y}, {r}, {w}, {h}, and {L}, after {o}, are mute, e.g. {koý} ko , {mrín:mor} Myeen-mo , {bol} bo , {htoO} 'to , {groh} gyo , {þi-hoL} Thee-ho .

UKT 201210: The name of one ethnic group {pa.oO.} (bookmark: pa1oOO1) is still unsettled in Romabama.

5th. [The nuclear vowel] {aa} before a coda final consonant gives the syllable the same power as {a.}, thus {aar} is pronounced, an , as if written {ar}, e.g. {maar-nût} man-nat.

UKT 201210: " {aar} is pronounced, an," may be acceptable when there were only two languages - Pali-Lanka and Pali-Myan - involved. However, when there are 4 languages, belonging to 3 language-groups involved as in BEPS, this inclusion of /n/ taking the place of /r/ is not acceptable.

 

§034. The sound of a final consonant is frequently modified by the initial consonant of the following syllable or word, as
  - {ak~hka.ra} ek-ka-ra , [ek-kha-ra, st.] not et-ka-ra ,
  - {þín~Bau} them-bau, not then-bau .
But these permutations, being dictates of nature, will be naturally acquired without rule. 

UKT 201210: Rev. Judson did not differentiate syllable {sa·ka:þän-su.} from word {waad}, because of which I've to come up with definitions for BEPS.

The first word {ak~hka.ra} is a trisyllabic word containing 3 syllables: {ak} , {hka.} , {ra}. The syllable {ak} with the structure CVÇ with onset C = 0, nuclear-vowel V = /æ/ , which is checked by coda {k}. We must note that as an American speaking GA (General American accent), he would not be able to hear  the difference between {ka} /k/ and {hka.} /kʰ/. I'm saying this from my experience of trying to make my American friends pronounce my Burmese name KYAW correctly.

The second word {þïn~Bau} is disyllabic word containing 2 syllables: {þín}, {Bau} . Note that the Burmese speakers always pronounced them with heavy ending sounds. We must also note that r1c5 akshara {gna.}/ {ng} /ŋ/ is not present in both English and Indic speakers and they tend to substitute with /n/.

 

§035. There is another permutation of perpetual occurrence which may be thus stated: [UKT ¶]

- when two syllables are in juxtaposition, so as to form one word, the first syllable ending in a vowel (except {a.}) [expressed.st.] or a nasal,
- and the onset initial letter of the second syllable being [c1 or c2] the first or second letter of either of the five classes of consonants, it frequently takes the sound of the [c3] third aks letter of the same row class;

UKT 201210: paraphrasing the above - which I presume is a rule formed by Judson or Judson's rule of Conjuncts :
In a disyllabic word the coda of the first syllable and the onset of the second form a conjunct, either vertical or horizontal, e.g.
  - {nak~hkût} formed from {nak} and {hkût}
  - {koaT~HTa.} (from {koaT~Hta.nu-na} 'leprosy'}, the first syllable is {koaT} and the second {HTa.}

that is,
- {ka.} and {hka.} are pronounced as {ga.};
- {sa.} and {hsa.}, as {za.}
- {Ta.} and {HTa.}, as {ða.} [Judson contradicts himself by writing {Ða.}]
- {ta.} and {hta.}, as {da.}
- {pa.} and {hpa.}, as {ba.}
thus {sa.ka:} "a word", is pronounced, not tsa-kah , but tsa-gah , as if written {sa.ga:} ,
and {ín tûn} "considerably", is pronounced, not en-tan , but en-dasn , as if written {ín-dan} ,

 

§036. But there are so many exceptions to this general rule, that regard to the coalescence of sounds as exhibited in common practice is recommended as the only true guide.
(p12end-p13begin)

Contents of this page

Pitch-registers or tones : (Judson: Accents)

§037. There are two accents, the short, light accent called Dot-below  {auk-mric} , and the short, heavy accent Double-dot or Visarga  {wic~sa.pauk}

UKT 201215: Burmese, Mon, Pali, and Sanskrit use of certain terms such as Visarga  {wic~sa.pauk} विसर्गः are not the same.

§038. The short, light accent Dot-below , called {a·mric}, the   {a·sak} stop, (formerly a small subscriptive ,) or {auk-mric} the under stop, is placed under the word {waad} letter, thus {kûn.}. [UKT ¶]

It is used with the vowels {É}, {è:}, {AÚ}, {o} [all 4 {a.wag}], and the nasal coda consonants  [ {ng}, {Ñ}, {N}, {n}, {m}] .

UKT 201213: Whenever, a foreigner uses the word vowel, make sure what he means: vowel letters, or vowel signs. Here Judson means vowel-signs even though his examples are vowel letters, the following are with vowel signs. They are pronounced with the shortest vowel duration. e.g.

{é.}, {è.}, {aú.}, {o.}
{ké.}, {kè.}, {kaú.}, {ko.}

§039. The short heavy accent Double-dot  , called [Visarga  {wic~sa.pauk}] {wic~sa.nhic-loän:pauk}, the two round woot-tsahs, or [BEPS ver. {shé.pauk}], the dots before (after), is placed after the latter, thus {kûn:}. [UKT ¶]

It is used with the vowels {aa}, {É}, {è:}, {AÚ}, {o} [5 vowels], and the nasal coda consonants. This accent is considered as inherent in the vowel {è:} (unless superseded by the light accent), and in the coda final consonant {m}, when combined with the vowel . In the latter case it is frequently omitted as superfluous; and in the former case, almost uniformly, in modern usage.

Contents of this page

Abbreviations

UKT 201213: Most of the abbreviations contradict Akshara rules. Though they are useful when only one language - Bur-Myan - is involved, by play havoc in BEPS, 4 speeches in 3 scripts belonging to 3 language groups - the Tib-Bur, IE, and Aus-Asi. Most of them are illegal in BEPS

§040. [Judson's table is given on the right.]

 

§041. {ya.} is sometimes represented by its symbol [Ya'pín sign ], after {k}, as {yauk~kya:} for , for , &c.

 

§042. {ng} or {ng:} is frequently removed from its natural situation in the line, and placed over the following aks letter, as {þïn~kûn:} for  {þín-kûn:}. (In this position it is called {kín:si:}.St. [ lit. ridden by a centipede]). In the case of {ng:}, the accent is omitted, without affecting the pronunciation; as {þïn~Bau:} for {þín:Bau:}.  
(p13end-p14begin)

Contents of this page

Numerical figures

§043.
----- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ------------  -------------- ------------- ---------
- {tic}, {nhic}, {þoän:}, {lé:}, {gna:}, {hkrauk}, {hku.nic}, {Shic}, {ko:}
---- 1 -------- 2 --------- 3 ------------ 4 ------- 5 ------------ 6 -------------- 7 ------------- 8 --------- 9

UKT 201213: I've included {þoän-Ña.} , zero 0, for building up numbers beyond 9. Thus: Ten, Twenty, Thirty, ...
ten:  {tic-hsèý} ; {nhic-hsèý} ; {þoän:hsèý} ; ...
hundred: {tic-ra} ; {nhic-ra} ;
thousand: {tic-htaún ;

 

Contents of this page

Punctuation

§044. The mark [called Danda । in Skt-Dev, and {poad-hprût}] called {peik}* or {a·peik}, a stop , [UKT ¶]

*UKT 201216: There are two words which can be mistaken - one for the other - {poad} and {peid}
  {poad} > {poad-hprût} - n. punctuation mark consisting of one vertical line indicating a short pause -- MLC MED2006-275c1
  {peid} - n. stanza, paragraph, passage (piece of writing) -- MLC MED2006-275c1.

is used to separate sentences, and the clauses or a sentence. The double mark [ {poad-ma.}] {peik-kri:} a great stop , is used to divide paragraphs.

 

§045. The mark {peik-ka.lé} a little stop , begins to be used in printed books, as an equivalent to the English comma, (a great desideratum in Burmese writing) leaving the to supply the place of semicolon and period.

(p14-to continue) in JudsonGram2.htm
for Parts os Speech.

Contents of this page

Author's footnotes

Jp06-fn01 - The Sanscrit authorities, it is true, give the second akshara of the class, r3c2, as the adjunct to the [Semi]-nasal {Na.}; but the Pali authorities give the third, r3c3, which is here adopted. - go back Jp06-fn01b

Jp11-fn01 - O , as oo in foot.st. - go back Jp11-fn01b
Jp11-fn02 - Ooa , as oo in foot , or soon.st. - go back Jp11-fn02b
Jp11-fn03 - Pron , myit-ta.st - go back Jp11-fn03b

 

Contents of this page

UKT notes

 

Contents of this page

End of TIL file